11/17/2023 0 Comments Git delete branch error not y merged![]() If there is, say, a web interface that lets you change the current branch on the remote, it is going to have to do this git symbolic-ref operation for you. Of course, this assumes you can log in (see first point). The trick here is to use git symbolic-ref to update HEAD: git symbolic-ref HEAD refs/heads/master It's probably a -bare repository, so that you can't use git checkout directly. Are you even allowed to log in? If not, you need some alternative (which is server-specific). But there's a hitch or two with push-able repositories on servers: In general, the same way you do it with any repository: log in, cd to the repository directory, and run git checkout. Yes (well, "instead of" rather than "also"). So when you have your Git ask the other Git to delete feat, it's the other Git complaining that feat is the current branch.ĭoes the current branch also need to be set in the remote directory? ![]() You have the right idea, but you have to remember that there are two repositories-two Gits-involved.Īny time you get text prefixed with remote:, this means the text is coming from the other Git. Choose a branch in the Settings view under "Default branch" and click "Save changes" to set the current branch on the server. I want to use the Github API, because the Jenkins job which is controlling this, does not know a thing about the repository or its branches. You need the one under the Settings view (not the Project view). So far so good.But I am not able to delete the branch after successfull merge. So you can now do a git bisect reset -ignore-other-worktrees (to clean up the current bisect), and then change branches to allow the deletion of the current branch in the main repository.Edit (per comments by OP-I have not used GitLab): GitLab has a web interface with dropdowns. Let's teach bisect to use the " -ignore-other-worktrees" flag. If a branch is bisected in a worktree while also being checked out in another worktree when the bisection is finished, checking out the branch back in the current worktree may fail. Since 1d0fa89 (" checkout: add -ignore-other-wortrees",, Git v2.5.0-rc0 - merge listed in batch #2) we have a safety valve in checkout/switch to prevent the same branch from being checked out simultaneously in multiple worktrees. (Merged by Junio C Hamano - gitster - in commit c79786c, ) bisect: fix " reset" when branch is checked out elsewhere See commit 7fb8904 () by Rubén Justo ( rjusto). To avoid that scenario, you can use a new option with Git 2.41 (Q2 2023), which allows " git bisect reset" ( man) to check out the original branch when the branch is already checked out in a different worktree linked to the same repository. while that same branch is also checked out in another worktree. One reason a git bisect can remain incomplete is because it remains stuck on a commit needing to check out a branch in a worktree. R=218428662e6f8d30a83cf8a89f531553f1156d25įor f in $( git tag -l git branch -a ) doīadambassador's answer mentions the case of a git bisect in-progress in a worktree. # Remove GNU/cesanta branches so we cannot accidentally merge or cherrypick from them! In a shell script this then might look like this: #! /bin/bash Hope this helps someone else to get unstuck when they're in the same boat as me, trying to filter/selectively remove branches in a repo where some of them are present due to previous git remote add commands. ![]() (No that I've found what I needed there's also git: How to delete a local ref branch?, which did NOT show up as I had forgotten the 'ref' bit about these branches being references.) Then you open the file allcommits in a text editor, and search for 'initial commit'. Google DID NOT deliver anything useful despite several different approaches. You can do this kind of magic with git fast-export (after you made a backup of your working copy): Run git fast-export -no-data -all -full-tree > allcommits in your working copy. Took a while to uncover my mistake and only the fact that TortoiseGit could do it led me on the right path when I was stuck. The magic is to remember here that these are references and MUST be deleted via git update-ref -d remotes/coolsnake/dev ![]() You'll get the error: branch 'remotes/coolsnake/dev' not found. When you try git branch -d remotes/coolsnake/dev a local references to "remote" branches in registered git remote add. Ran into this problem today for branches reported by git branch -a and look like this one: remotes/coolsnake/dev, i.e.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |